{"id":17,"date":"2021-05-24T15:36:05","date_gmt":"2021-05-24T13:36:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/?page_id=17"},"modified":"2021-05-24T15:36:05","modified_gmt":"2021-05-24T13:36:05","slug":"publikacje","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/?page_id=17","title":{"rendered":"Publikacje"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/stan-epidemii.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-383\" width=\"157\" height=\"276\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/stan-epidemii.png 511w, https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/stan-epidemii-170x300.png 170w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 157px) 100vw, 157px\" \/><figcaption><strong>L. Bosek, Stan epidemii. Konstrukcja prawa, Warszawa 2022<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Monografia\u00a0wyczerpuj\u0105co omawia podstawow\u0105\u00a0instytucj\u0119 polskiego prawa medycznego w szerokim prawnopor\u00f3wnawczym, prawnomi\u0119dzynarodowym oraz konstytucyjnym kontek\u015bcie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Ksi\u0105\u017cka zawiera om\u00f3wienie nast\u0119puj\u0105cych zagadnie\u0144: stanu epidemii w \u015bwietle powszechnego prawa mi\u0119dzynarodowego i europejskiego, w tym uregulowa\u0144 \u015awiatowej Organizacji Zdrowia okre\u015blaj\u0105cych instytucj\u0119 stanu zagro\u017cenia zdrowia publicznego o znaczeniu mi\u0119dzynarodowym (z ang. \u201eA Public Health Emergency of International Concern\u201d (PHEIC)), Mi\u0119dzynarodowego Paktu Praw Gospodarczych, Spo\u0142ecznych i Kulturalnych, Mi\u0119dzynarodowego Paktu Praw Obywatelskich i Politycznych, standard\u00f3w Rady Europy, a w tym Konwencji o Ochronie Praw Cz\u0142owieka i Podstawowych Wolno\u015bci, Konwencji o Prawach Cz\u0142owieka i Biomedycynie, Europejskiej Karty Spo\u0142ecznej oraz rekomendacji i zalece\u0144 Zgromadzenia Parlamentarnego RE oraz Komitetu Ministr\u00f3w RE, a tak\u017ce prawa UE, w tym uregulowa\u0144 traktatowych oraz decyzji Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady Nr 1082\/2013\/UE w sprawie powa\u017cnych transgranicznych zagro\u017ce\u0144 zdrowia; stanu epidemii w \u015bwietle uregulowa\u0144 wybranych pa\u0144stw UE,\u00a0w tym\u00a0niemieckiej konstrukcji stanu epidemii o zasi\u0119gu krajowym (Epidemische Lage von nationaler Tragweite), francuskiej konstrukcji stanu epidemii (l\u2019\u00e9tat d\u2019urgence sanitaire),\u00a0w\u0142oskiej konstrukcji og\u00f3lnokrajowego stanu zagro\u017cenia epidemicznego (stato di emergenza di rilievo nazionale), a tak\u017ce szwedzkiej ustawy o ochronie przed chorobami zaka\u017anymi i konstrukcji niewi\u0105\u017c\u0105cych formalnie zalece\u0144 sanitarnych; stanu epidemii w \u015bwietle ewolucji polskich uregulowa\u0144 epidemicznych, w tym ustaw sanitarnych z 1919 r., 1935 r., 1963 r. oraz 2001 r.; konstytucyjnych podstaw stanu epidemii, m.in. zwalczanie chor\u00f3b epidemicznych w \u015bwietle art. 68 Konstytucji RP, zwalczanie chor\u00f3b zaka\u017anych w re\u017cimie kl\u0119ski \u017cywio\u0142owej; ustawowych ram stanu epidemii, w tym szczeg\u00f3\u0142owa charakterystyka definicji legalnej stanu epidemii, ukszta\u0142towania upowa\u017cnie\u0144 prawodawczych w ZapobChor\u00f3bU, problem szczepie\u0144 przeciw COVID-19, stanu epidemii w \u015bwietle przepis\u00f3w odr\u0119bnych, w tym z zakresu prawa cywilnego oraz przepis\u00f3w funkcjonalnie zwi\u0105zanych z instytucj\u0105 stanu epidemii; stanu epidemii w \u015bwietle\u00a0praktyki legislacyjnej Rady Ministr\u00f3w i Ministra Zdrowia zwi\u0105zanej z epidemi\u0105 COVID-19, w tym analiz\u0119 rozporz\u0105dze\u0144 MZ i RM ustanawiaj\u0105cych normatywne ograniczenia epidemiczne.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/epide-beck.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-200\" width=\"155\" height=\"231\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/epide-beck.png 603w, https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/epide-beck-201x300.png 201w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 155px) 100vw, 155px\" \/><figcaption><strong>L. Bosek (red.), Ustawa o zapobieganiu oraz zwalczaniu zaka\u017ce\u0144 i chor\u00f3b zaka\u017anych u ludzi. Komentarz, Warszawa 2020<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Jedyny w doktrynie polskiego prawa komentarz do ustawy o zapobieganiu oraz zwalczaniu zaka\u017ce\u0144 i chor\u00f3b zaka\u017anych u ludzi.&nbsp;Komentarz prezentuje ca\u0142o\u015b\u0107 problematyki epidemicznej zwi\u0105zanej ze stosowaniem w praktyce poszczeg\u00f3lnych przepis\u00f3w ustawy oraz powsta\u0142e w zwi\u0105zku z ich wyk\u0142adni\u0105 w\u0105tpliwo\u015bci. Powo\u0142ano istotne z punktu widzenia praktyki&nbsp;orzecznictwo, w tym orzecznictwo Trybuna\u0142u Sprawiedliwo\u015bci Unii Europejskiej, Trybuna\u0142u Konstytucyjnego, S\u0105du Najwy\u017cszego i Naczelnego S\u0105du Administracyjnego,&nbsp;a tak\u017ce&nbsp;wypowiedzi przedstawicieli doktryny. Komentarz uwzgl\u0119dnia stan prawny na dzie\u0144 2.11.2020 r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Koemntarz.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-85\" width=\"171\" height=\"255\"\/><figcaption><strong>L. Bosek (red.), Ustawa o prawach pacjenta i Rzeczniku Praw Pacjenta. Komentarz, Warszawa 2020<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Publikacja stanowi kompleksowe i szczeg\u00f3\u0142owe opracowanie przepis\u00f3w wskazanej ustawy wraz z wyczerpuj\u0105cym komentarzem wyja\u015bniaj\u0105cym zagadnienia pojawiaj\u0105ce si\u0119 przy jej stosowaniu. Komentarz zawiera om\u00f3wienie praw pacjent\u00f3w w odniesieniu do m.in.:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-list\"><li>\u015bwiadcze\u0144 zdrowotnych,<\/li><li>informacji,<\/li><li>dzia\u0142a\u0144 niepo\u017c\u0105danych produkt\u00f3w leczniczych,<\/li><li>tajemnicy informacji zwi\u0105zanych z pacjentem,<\/li><li>wyra\u017cenia zgody na udzielenie \u015bwiadcze\u0144 zdrowotnych,<\/li><li>poszanowania intymno\u015bci i godno\u015bci pacjenta,<\/li><li>dokumentacji medycznej,<\/li><li>zg\u0142oszenia sprzeciwu wobec opinii albo orzeczenia lekarza,<\/li><li>poszanowania \u017cycia prywatnego i rodzinnego,<\/li><li>opieki duszpasterskiej,<\/li><li>przechowywania rzeczy warto\u015bciowych w depozycie.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">Komentarz obejmuje stan prawny na dzie\u0144 1.3.2020 r<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/System.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-86\" width=\"175\" height=\"259\"\/><figcaption><strong>M. Safjan, L. Bosek (red.), System Prawa medycznego<\/strong>. <strong>Instytucje prawa medycznego. Tom 1, Warszawa 2017<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\">System Prawa Medycznego to sze\u015bciotomowe dzie\u0142o&nbsp;kompleksowo omawiaj\u0105ce ca\u0142y polski system prawa medycznego. Przygotowany z wielk\u0105 staranno\u015bci\u0105 podzia\u0142 materii pozwala Autorom \u2013&nbsp;najwybitniejszym znawcom prawa medycznego w Polsce&nbsp;\u2013 przeprowadzi\u0107&nbsp;dog\u0142\u0119bn\u0105 analiz\u0119 wszystkich zagadnie\u0144&nbsp;tej nowej ga\u0142\u0119zi prawa, nurtuj\u0105cych zar\u00f3wno teoretyk\u00f3w, jak i praktyk\u00f3w. Nad redakcj\u0105 merytoryczn\u0105 ca\u0142ego zbioru czuwaj\u0105 prof. Marek Safjan oraz prof. Leszek Bosek. Redaktorami Naukowymi poszczeg\u00f3lnych tom\u00f3w s\u0105 wybitni specjali\u015bci w danych dziedzinach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/tom2-1.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-262\" width=\"176\" height=\"263\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/tom2-1.png 603w, https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/tom2-1-201x300.png 201w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 176px) 100vw, 176px\" \/><figcaption><strong>L. Bosek, A. Wnukiewicz-Koz\u0142owska (red.), System prawa medycznego. Szczeg\u00f3lne \u015bwiadczenia zdrowotne. Tom 2, Warszawa 2018<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/t3.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-263\" width=\"172\" height=\"257\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/t3.png 403w, https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/t3-201x300.png 201w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 172px) 100vw, 172px\" \/><figcaption><strong>D. Bach-Golecka, R. Stankiewicz (red.), System prawa medycznego. Organizacja systemu ochrony zdrowia. Tom 3, Warszawa 2020<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/tom-4.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-264\" width=\"160\" height=\"238\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/tom-4.png 403w, https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/tom-4-201x300.png 201w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 160px) 100vw, 160px\" \/><figcaption><strong>J. Haberko (red.), System prawa medycznego. Prawo farmaceutyczne. Tom 4, Warszawa 2019<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/19951-odpowiedzialnosc-prywatnoprawna-system-prawa-medycznego-tom-5-ewa-baginska.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-265\" width=\"153\" height=\"238\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/19951-odpowiedzialnosc-prywatnoprawna-system-prawa-medycznego-tom-5-ewa-baginska.png 387w, https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/19951-odpowiedzialnosc-prywatnoprawna-system-prawa-medycznego-tom-5-ewa-baginska-193x300.png 193w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 153px) 100vw, 153px\" \/><figcaption><strong>E. Bagi\u0144ska (red.), System prawa medycznego. Odpowiedzialno\u015b\u0107 prywatnoprawna. Tom 5, Warszawa 2021<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/D.-Bach-Golecka.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-333\" width=\"151\" height=\"228\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/D.-Bach-Golecka.jpeg 306w, https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/D.-Bach-Golecka-200x300.jpeg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 151px) 100vw, 151px\" \/><figcaption><strong>D. Bach-Golecka (ed.), Compensation Schemes for Damages Caused by Healthcare and Alternatives to Court Proceedings. Comparative Law Perspectives, Springer 2021<\/strong> <br><strong>chapter: D. Bach-Golecka, <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-030-67000-9_1\">Compensation Schemes and Extra-Judicial Solutions in Case of Medical Malpractice. A Commentary on Contemporary Arrangements<\/a>, pages 1-39<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:14px\"><strong>Abstract: <\/strong>The article deals with compensation schemes and alternative methods of dispute resolution in situations of damages resulting from medical malpractice. The topic is analysed within different perspectives. Firstly, the examination of human rights and public international law provisions is performed in order to identify the meaning of the right to health and the right to healthcare as a possible benchmark of healthcare provision in a domestic context. Moreover, this international legal approach is supplemented with European Union&nbsp;law analysis. Secondly, the relevant contemporary phenomena in the provision of healthcare are being dealt with. In this context patients are regarded as consumers of healthcare services while within the contemporary approach both parties of the medical relationship are treated as equal in their competence to make valid decisions concerning prospective treatment. Nowadays the authority of physician is based in her or his professional qualifications and the patient\u2019s competence is rooted in the construction of informed consent procedure. Therefore the current process of providing healthcare resembles a scientific endeavour rather than a relationship with paternalistic legal element, it is not any more a dual medical contract but a situation concentrated on healthcare activities, with multilateral dimension and co-shared decision-making, alongside many lines of internal communication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" id=\"Par1\" style=\"font-size:14px\">Those characteristics of medical service are crucial within the process of identifying patterns of compensation arrangements and extra-judicial solutions in case of medical malpractice. The article aims at evaluating the possible and most often used methods of alternative dispute resolution in healthcare context within selected jurisdictions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/EJHL.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-113\" width=\"145\" height=\"218\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/EJHL.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/EJHL-200x300.jpeg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 145px) 100vw, 145px\" \/><figcaption><strong>L. Bosek, Anti-Epidemic Emergency Regimes under Polish Law in Comparative, Historical and Jurisprudential Perspective, European Journal of Health Law 28 (2021) 113\u2013141<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:14px\"><strong>Abstract:<\/strong> The SARS-CoV-2 crisis of 2020 triggered a number of unprecedented reactions of European states, in particular in the form of either constitutional emergency measures or statutory anti-epidemic emergency measures. Poland chose to deal with the crisis by delegating powers to the executive by ordinary legislative means and declared a nationwide state of epidemic emergency on 13 March 2020 and a week later a state of epidemic on the basis of the Act of 5 December 2008 on preventing and combating infections and infectious diseases. For a century, Poland has been dealing with epidemics by delegating powers to the executive by ordinary legislative means. Anti-epidemic emergency measures were developed under the relevant acts of 1919, 1935, 1963, 2001, 2008 and now form an autonomous normative model authorised directly by Article 68 (4) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997. The Constitution of 2 April 1997 authorises also extraordinary measures in situations of particular danger, \u201cif ordinary constitutional measures are inadequate\u201d. This article analyses anti-epidemic emergency regimes under Polish law in a comparative, historical and jurisprudential perspective.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/ML-717x1024.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-274\" width=\"163\" height=\"230\"\/><figcaption><strong>M. Safjan (ed.), Medical law. Cases and commentaries, Warsaw 2012<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:14px\">The publication presents several dozen judgements of European and constitutional tribunals and of Polish as well as foreign courts which relate to the main issues of the debate conducted in Poland nowadays. They illustrate current development trends that occur in Polish and European medical law and also reveal the complexity and intricacy of medical issues. Separate statements enclosed to some judgements highlight the broad scope of problems arising in that field.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:14px\">Glosses to each of the judgements and separate footnotes referring the reader to the literature provide a complete description of the subject matter. They also clarify the normative context of the cases reviewed. Moreover, all comments present problems from legal, ethical, political and even economic perspective. Both theoretical and practical aspects of issues concerning vindication of claims and the range of presentation of claims are highlighted in the book.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image is-resized is-style-rounded\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/EJHL.jpeg\" alt=\"Obrazek posiada pusty atrybut alt; plik o nazwie EJHL.jpeg\" width=\"143\" height=\"215\"\/><figcaption><strong>L. Bosek, W. Borysiak, The Determination of Death under Polish Law in Comparative, Historical and Medical Perspective, European Journal of Health Law 28 (2020) 1\u201320<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"font-size:14px\"><strong>Abstract:<\/strong> It has been recently adopted under Polish law that the determinant of death is both the brain death criterion, tantamount to the permanent and irreversible cessation of its function, and the equally valid circulatory criterion. This means that the determination of brain death is not indispensable to pronounce a person dead, because the irreversible cessation of circulation is sufficient in this respect. The purpose of this article is to present current developments in Polish law against the comparative, historical and medical background.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Monografia\u00a0wyczerpuj\u0105co omawia podstawow\u0105\u00a0instytucj\u0119 polskiego prawa medycznego w szerokim prawnopor\u00f3wnawczym, prawnomi\u0119dzynarodowym oraz konstytucyjnym kontek\u015bcie. Ksi\u0105\u017cka zawiera om\u00f3wienie nast\u0119puj\u0105cych zagadnie\u0144: stanu epidemii w \u015bwietle powszechnego prawa mi\u0119dzynarodowego &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-17","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/17","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/17\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cpm.wpia.uw.edu.pl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}